Please explain your conclusion logically so all resistance members can tell exactly how you arrived at this conclusion...or are you simply trying to create unnecessary and suspicious tension?
It's simple really. You've only done everything in a logical, close minded pattern in order to invalidate previous accusations of previous spy nature. In reality, you probably have the most influence of the game over anyone due to your past experience and history. In order to keep ALL the attention on you, you give the most logical way of proceeding in plans, not only in phase one, but a if/or situation for phase two depending on the results. But there are some inconsistencies on how this should really be played out.
You being on the first wave, as well as PREEMPTIVELY suggesting that everyone should vote yes as it'd be in favor of the spies long term, and only in favor of the resistance short term. That's fine, because you're right, it would be silly to let it be known that in those three, there is a spy. The odds of having the fingers pointed are too great. But knowing that the odds are going to be in the favor of resistance after the first wave, you ALREADY suggest that you should be the second wave with four people in order to ensure that YOU have control. If there was a fourth member who joined the second wave on top of the first wave that already voted succeed, the LOGICAL suggestion would be that the fourth person would be the new spy. For you showing the plan, you're already able to take focus off of yourself and on another, while at the same time having the trust of everyone due to your leadership and experience.
I believe that you, in the best situation possible, are trying to take not only early vouch for not being a spy, but trying to early game mastermind the entire progression of things. With so many new players, this will be the easiest way for you to win.
Back to your feigning of ignorance and confusion, this only further solidifies that you only want it to LOOK like you're taking a back seat, while at the same time having control over as many impressionable people as possible.